💸 Back-a-buddy HELP fund Stolen Ground 2 & 3: backabuddy.co.za/campaign/stolen-ground-2
(BaB accepts international donations too)
EFT Details:
Bank: FNB
Account Holder: Deep Focus (Pty) Ltd
Account Type: Gold Business Account
Account Number: 63171960321
Branch Code: 250655
Swift Code: FIRNZAJJ
Ref: Stolen Ground
Donate via Lightning: joeemilio@blink.sv
More info: stolenground.co.za
WATCH 👀 Stolen Ground: The Tygerberg Raceway story — Who’s really behind the land grabs in South Africa?
youtu.be/u4XZaRrhaZM
___________________________________
🏆 Become a member to my YT Channel for some perks:
youtube.com/channel/UCdU01vCV2s1obEC9qPZc85Q/…
___________________________________
⬇️ Social media Links 📱:
Facebook: facebook.com/share/16CXSoQw3H/?mibextid=wwXIfr
Instagram: instagram.com/newsflashwjoeemilio?igsh=cGZuYX…
Tiktok: tiktok.com/@newsflashwjoeemilio?_t=ZM-8u6Sl1H…
📲 Follow the official Newsflash WhatsApp Channel for breaking news, episode drops, documentary updates, and exclusive content:
whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbCNjpBCnA7svKRUgA2E
_________________________________
News24 has published an investigation into AfriForum’s finances, salaries, marketing expenditure and growing organizational structure. But does the reporting reveal a genuine financial scandal, or has an attempted exposé unintentionally demonstrated the scale and success of one of South Africa’s most influential civil society organizations?
In this episode of News Flash, Joey Melia examines the controversy surrounding News24’s coverage of AfriForum’s money, including the salaries reportedly earned by senior personnel, the organization’s spending priorities and the argument that staff costs represent an unusually large portion of its expenses.
The central question is simple: should members of a nonprofit organization be concerned about executive salaries when their contributions are voluntary and the organization continues delivering visible projects? That issue is compared with the accountability expected from government officials and executives at state-owned entities who are paid using public money.
The discussion also considers AfriForum’s membership, community safety initiatives, neighborhood watches, legal campaigns, minority rights advocacy and involvement in public debates about farm attacks and farm murders. Joey argues that these activities provide members with tangible reasons to continue supporting the organization, regardless of how critics interpret its financial statements.
News24’s history of reporting on AfriForum is also placed under scrutiny. The episode revisits the dispute over whether AfriForum claimed that a genocide was taking place in South Africa, as well as the subsequent correction and apology associated with that reporting. This raises broader questions about media credibility, editorial framing and the increasingly hostile relationship between traditional South African news organizations and influential civil society groups.
Also examined is commentary from Martin van Staden of the Free Market Foundation, who argued that salaries are normally the largest expense in organizations and that AfriForum employees are reportedly paid toward the lower end of the relevant Paterson grading ranges. The episode contrasts the compensation of AfriForum directors with senior executives at Eskom, Transnet and other public institutions.
The debate extends beyond one article. What makes investigative journalism legitimate? Does revealing a large salary automatically expose wrongdoing? Should voluntary membership organizations be judged by their expenditure ratios, their measurable results, or both? And does describing ordinary operating costs in sensational language serve the public interest?
TruthFirst Foundation’s reported assistance with the investigation is discussed alongside its relationship with South African media and disinformation initiatives. Joey questions whether this arrangement provides sufficient independence and whether the resulting investigation supports the dramatic framing applied to AfriForum’s finances.
The episode also confronts wider political issues, including unemployment, violent crime, gender-based violence, farm attacks, race-based legislation, Black Economic Empowerment, government expenditure and alleged corruption within South African institutions. The argument presented is that investigative resources should focus more aggressively on organizations and officials controlling compulsory public funds.
#News24 #AfriForum #SouthAfrica #SouthAfricanPolitics #MediaBias #InvestigativeJournalism #CivilSociety #Solidarity #FarmMurders #NewsFlash
